Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
EPA under fire
#1
CEI, Science Groups Petition EPA to Reconsider Increasingly Dubious Global Warming “Endangerment” Finding
http://cei.org/news-release/2010/02/12/c...obal-warmi

US Reps from Mo. to propose blocking EPA gas rules
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100202/ap_o...y_missouri

Senior Democrats floating bill to block EPA on plans for greenhouse gas rules
http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-...ate-change

World’s biggest coal company brings U.S. government to court in climate fraud
http://www.climategate.com/worlds-bigges...mate-fraud

Barbour Lobbies Fellow Governors to Oppose EPA Regulations
http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2010/02/19/...61154.html

Va. challenges EPA’s stance on global warming
http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/s...05/324766/

Va. AG: Leaked e-mails basis for EPA challenge
http://www.wtop.com/?nid=600&sid=1890032

Utah Legislature: House formally questions global warming
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/70000...rming.html

UPDATE 1-Texas to challenge US greenhouse gas rules
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1661844120100216
#2
And well they should be.

CO2, the element of most of this planet's life, is not a pollutant.
I know you think you understand what you thought I said,
but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!






Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)