Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New owner
#21
Good news. It may well be that in about a month or so things here get better.

I hope this forum and the There is no greenhouse effect facebook group will continue to grow and get better together. I think there is a lot of crossover between the two.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply
#22
Hello readers,

soon I will once again be the owner of this forum with a new emphasis on education for the public.

Cheers,

Thomas
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Reply
#23
Hello visitors and readers,

I have the forum back in my control,but need to do some work to clean up a few things behind the scenes.

What I have in mind for the forum is more of the same but some new stuff as well.It appears that many warmists I come across are terribly misinformed on the main points of the climate debate and have showed extreme bigotry on source links,given to them.

Maybe it is time that I post exhaustive essays with the charts in them,to hopefully open their eyes to the deceptions they have been corn fed?

In any rate I have to find a way to make this forum worth more visits from YOU than it is getting now.

What do you think should be done here?
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)