Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Articles?
#1
GREENHOUSE GASES

Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics

Dead Link removed 7/21/2012

New Link is a PDF



Carbon Dioxide: The Houdini of Gases


http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com/pdf/..._Gases.pdf




Rethinking the "greenhouse effect"


http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com/pdf/...effect.pdf



HEAT STORED BY GREENHOUSE GASES

http://biocab.org/Heat_Storage.html



Greenhouse Gas Facts and Fantasies

by Tom Kondis
May 21, 2008

To support their argument, advocates of man-made global warming have intermingled elements of greenhouse activity and infrared absorption to promote the image that carbon dioxide traps heat near earth's surface like molecular greenhouses insulating our atmosphere. Their imagery, however, is seriously flawed.

A greenhouse is simply a physical structure that traps hot air. Solar radiation initiates the heating sequence inside a greenhouse when photons in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum, entering through glass or transparent plastic panels, are absorbed by surfaces of opaque objects. Reflected photons exit freely; neither they, nor their "heat," are trapped inside. Drivers who regularly park their mobile greenhouses in sunny locations exploit this principle by placing reflective white cardboard behind their windshields to expel some before they're absorbed.

Although transparent to visible photons, greenhouse panels absorb weaker radiation in the infrared (IR) region of the spectrum. Solar IR photons can't enter. This fact requires spectroscopists to use exotic window materials such as polished rock salt in their IR pursuits. Visible radiation, not IR, energizes a greenhouse.

Advocates misuse the term "absorption" of photons by substances as being analogous to water sopped up by a sponge, unchanged, implying physical entrapment. Actually, it means that the photon smoothly transfers its radiant energy to kinetic form. Absorption is an energy transition, not a trap; photons don't occupy molecular cages. Similarly, emission is the reverse kinetic to radiant transfer.

An absorbed photon disappears as its discrete packet (quantum) of radiant energy dissipates into a diverse kinetic assortment of motion, vibrations or collisions involving atoms and molecules of the absorbing substance. Imagine one shot of your metabolic energy, through cue stick and cue ball, scattering a rack of balls on a pool table. These transfers obey the second law of thermodynamics, popularly stated as the spontaneous downhill flow from high to low energy, or hot to cold. Inside a greenhouse, visible photons define the hilltop from which this flow begins. IR photons, when emitted, are near the bottom of a typical greenhouse energy hill.

Continuing the sequence, the confined greenhouse atmosphere is convectively heated through molecular collisions with hotter opaque surfaces; its composition is at least 99.95% by volume nitrogen, oxygen, water vapor and argon. Carbon dioxide, only about 0.035% of the trapped hot air, is insignificant in this role. Drivers of mobile greenhouses recognize this principle too, when they crack open windows of their parked vehicles to partially disable the trap. Any gas can convectively transfer heat, but no gas can possibly mimic greenhouse-type entrapment of hot air. A greenhouse-carbon dioxide analogy has no logical basis.

Because a greenhouse obviously warms in the sunshine, the second law of thermodynamics is sometimes misconstrued. However, using the pool table analogy, if a person could repeatedly strike moving balls as rapidly as the sun pours visible photons into a greenhouse, the chaos on the table reasonably simulates greenhouse heating. But terminate the energy input, and the dissipation process mandated by the second law becomes obvious; a greenhouse cools, and the balls stop.

Advocates err when they equate absorption of IR photons by atmospheric carbon dioxide to absorption of exponentially higher intensity visible photons by objects inside a greenhouse. This exponential energy relationship, the Stefan-Boltzmann Law, is fundamental to thermal radiation and establishes the location of visible photons at the summit and IR photons near the base of typical greenhouse energy hills. For example, visible photons carry the intense energy representing solar surface temperatures. This intensity rapidly decreases with temperature.

The link to Junkscience is dead and the search for the above article failed.Therefore I am posting it in full here.

The Lynching of Carbon Dioxide -
The Innocent Source of Life


http://carbon-sense.com/wp-content/uploa...tzberg.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#2
GREENHOUSE GASES

Greenhouse Gas Hypothesis Violates Fundamentals of Physics

http://freenet-homepage.de/klima/indexe.htm



Absorption of Carbon Dioxide
from the Atmosphere


http://www.john-daly.com/co2-conc/ahl-co2.htm



On the Phenomenon of Atmospheric Backradiation

http://www.geocities.com/atmosco2/backrad.htm

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#3
GREENHOUSE GASES

Radical New Hypothesis on the Effect of Greenhouse Gases

http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/03...use-gases/



CO2 Forcing: Fact or Fiction

http://www.palisad.com/co2/slides/siframes.html



Proof that anthropogenic CO2 is not accumulating
by Alan Siddons


http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=...mments_top



The Greenhouse Hustle

http://climaterealists.com/attachments/d...Hustle.pdf

Link updated 2-25-2017




Water vapor is an "anti-greenhouse gas"


http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=2494


Cold Facts on Global Warming

http://www.randombio.com/co2.html

New Link 1/17/2015


It's like a River, not a Window

http://www.nov55.com/ntyg.html
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#4
POLITICAL


Senator Kerry Misfires about Global Warming and National Security

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images...sfires.pdf



It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#5
SOLAR

Solar Cycle Linked To Global Climate

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/200...113358.htm



Livingston and Penn paper: “Sunspots may vanish by 2015?.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/06/02/li...h-by-2015/
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#6
Essay and Summaries

Editorial: The Great Global Warming Hoax?


http://www.middlebury.net/op-ed/global-warming-01.html



Greenhouse Theory Disproved a Century Ago

http://globalwarmingnot.blogtownhall.com..._ago.thtml



Mental Challenges - Anthropogenic Global Warming Gone Insane

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/AG...llenge.htm



Hot & Cold Media
Spin Cycle:


http://epw.senate.gov/repwhitepapers/634...0Media.pdf



The Skeptics Handbook

http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming/



– Scientific Evidence Rejects Anthropogenic CO2 Theory

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Summary.htm



"World cooling has set in and it will stay
colder for at least 100 years predicts
scientist in forecast breakthrough”


http://tech-know.eu/uploads/World_coolin..._years.pdf



Fire and Ice

http://www.businessandmedia.org/specialr...andice.asp
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#7
Global or Regional Temperature


Global Temperature Prediction from Recurrent Cycles

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/Pr...Cycles.htm



AMO, THE KEY GLOBAL CLIMATE INDICATOR

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/amoarticlel.pdf



The Measurement of Global Temperatures

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW...easure.htm



The Pacific Decadal Oscillation

http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/645fall2003_...n/pdo1.htm
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#8
Science Research


On the First Principles of Heat Transfer: A Note from Alan Siddons

http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=3248



Limits on CO2 Climate Forcing from Recent Temperature Data of Earth


http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0809/0809.0581.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#9
Dr. Glassman


INTERNAL MODELING MISTAKES BY IPCC ARE SUFFICIENT
TO REJECT ITS ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING CONJECTURE


http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2...es_by.html


ON WHY CO2 IS KNOWN
NOT TO HAVE ACCUMULATED IN THE ATMOSPHERE &
WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH CO2 IN THE MODERN ERA


http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2....html#more
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#10
Hello reading members,

I need your help to build up this thread,for the purpose of educating the public.

Generally they should be readable for the non scientist.

Please send any article candidate to me by the forum Personal Message route.

I would appreciate it.

Sunsettommy
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#11
Posted two new entries,but could use help on the Solar and Political categories.

It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#12
GREENHOUSE GASES

Carbon cycle modelling and
the residence time of natural and
anthropogenic atmospheric CO2:
on the construction of the
"Greenhouse Effect Global Warming" dogma.


http://www.co2web.info/ESEF3VO2.htm
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#13
GREENHOUSE GASES

CO2, Temperatures and ice ages...

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/CO2,Temp...ages-f.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#14
OCEAN CYCLES

Oceanic Oscillations and Correlation to Climatic Phenomena

http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/PDO_AMO.htm
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#15
STATISTICAL ADJUSTMENTS

Are we feeling warmer yet?

http://www.nzclimatescience.org.nz/image...nz_pdf.pdf

Try this:

http://www.nzclimatescience.org.nz/image...ng_nz2.pdf

It appears the original link has been changed -JohnWho
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#16
Global Warming and Climate Change in Perspective: Truths and Myths About Carbon Dioxide, Scientific Consensus, and Climate Models
by William Happer (April 20, 2009)

Great perspective on the global warming debate by a reknowned Princeton physicist. This was a speech given to US Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in February, 2009. Terrific historical perspective and explanations in layman's language.

http://www.capmag.com/article.asp?ID=5441
#17
CLIMATEGATE

Climategate Document Database

http://www.climate-gate.org/
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#18
(11-25-2009, 09:16 AM)Sunsettommy Wrote: STATISTICAL ADJUSTMENTS

Are we feeling warmer yet?

http://www.nzclimatescience.org.nz/image...nz_pdf.pdf

Try this:

http://www.nzclimatescience.org.nz/image...ng_nz2.pdf

It appears the original link has been changed -JohnWho

A good companion piece to this one might be the dissection of the Northern Australia temperature "adjustments" at: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/th...rwin-zero/

I also remember reading something about Hansen doing some "adjusting" but can't remember where or who did the article. Mcintyre maybe? A phrase that stood out for me in that one was the incredible odds that almost all pre-1950 temps would be adjusted down while almost all more modern temps would be adjusted up. If anyone knows where to find that, I would love to have it.
#19
(12-09-2009, 07:35 AM)HarpoSpoke Wrote:
(11-25-2009, 09:16 AM)Sunsettommy Wrote: STATISTICAL ADJUSTMENTS

Are we feeling warmer yet?

http://www.nzclimatescience.org.nz/image...nz_pdf.pdf

Try this:

http://www.nzclimatescience.org.nz/image...ng_nz2.pdf

It appears the original link has been changed -JohnWho

A good companion piece to this one might be the dissection of the Northern Australia temperature "adjustments" at: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/08/th...rwin-zero/

I also remember reading something about Hansen doing some "adjusting" but can't remember where or who did the article. Mcintyre maybe? A phrase that stood out for me in that one was the incredible odds that almost all pre-1950 temps would be adjusted down while almost all more modern temps would be adjusted up. If anyone knows where to find that, I would love to have it.

Both Watts Up With That? and Climate Audit covered it last year.But what posted dates I do not know,maybe using the search function at their sites will work?
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#20
(12-09-2009, 07:42 AM)Sunsettommy Wrote:
(12-09-2009, 07:35 AM)HarpoSpoke Wrote: I also remember reading something about Hansen doing some "adjusting" but can't remember where or who did the article. Mcintyre maybe? A phrase that stood out for me in that one was the incredible odds that almost all pre-1950 temps would be adjusted down while almost all more modern temps would be adjusted up. If anyone knows where to find that, I would love to have it.

Both Watts Up With That? and Climate Audit covered it last year.But what posted dates I do not know,maybe using the search function at their sites will work?

Thanks...I'll give it a try.




Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)