Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Articles?
#21
New addition on post # 3.

I need help building up Climategate sources,please send Personal Message to Sunsettommy or Harpospoke,with suggestions.So far just one is listed in this thread.

You are also invited to send in other Worthy Articles To Read suggestions as well,to build up a good listing here.
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#22
Curious Anomalies in Climate Science

http://www.greenworldtrust.org.uk/Science/Curious.htm
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#23
A 2000-YEAR GLOBAL TEMPERATURE RECONSTRUCTION
BASED ON NON-TREERING PROXIES


http://www.ncasi.org/publications/Detail.aspx?id=3025
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#24
SURFACE TEMPERATURE RECORDS:
POLICY DRIVEN DECEPTION?


http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images...e_temp.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#25
Greenhouse Theory Disproved a Century Ago

http://my.telegraph.co.uk/reasonmclucus/...entury_ago
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#26
How Fast is Arctic Sea Ice Declining?

http://www.trevoole.co.uk/Questioning_Cl...ing_v2.pdf


Sunsettommy strongly recommends that this article be read and pondered over.
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#27
Wind Farms Provide Negligible Useful Electricity

http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20060331_wind.pdf


A suggestion for meeting the UK Government’s
renewable energy target because the adopted
use of windfarms cannot meet it

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images...ecture.pdf

Both presentations made by
Richard S Courtney
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#28
CONTIGUOUS U. S. TEMPERATURE TRENDS USING NCDC RAW AND ADJUSTED DATA FOR ONE-PER-STATE RURAL AND URBAN STATION SETS

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images...C_Data.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#29
Sunsettommy:

You point to my item at
http://ff.org/centers/csspp/pdf/20060331_wind.pdf

I provide a more complete explanation of windfarms that includes an overview of all existing and potential renewables at
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images...ecture.pdf

Richard

Sunsettommy:

Post # 27 now has both of your presentations listed.I am open to more from some of your friends as part of my effort to educate the general public.
#30
Glaciers-Science and Nonsense

http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/0....html#more
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#31
Predictability? With a Pinch of Salt please.. Part One

http://scienceofdoom.com/2010/02/13/pred...-part-one/
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#32
Quote:The possibility that the THC will change direction is a huge issue in the predictability of future climate.

CHANGE direction? Eh, what? Is the earth going to flip over? Timescales? THC cannot be equated with water going down a plughole. That circulation involves timescales over hundreds of years.
Pinch of salt indeed. What a load of pontificating twaddle.
Environmentalism is based on lies and the lies reflect an agenda that regards humanity as the enemy of the Earth. - Alan Caruba
#33
LOL,

I posted it to get a response.I agree that what he is suggesting appears silly.

He is one of the AGW believers who writes better than usual.

Good catch!
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#34
(04-06-2010, 07:02 PM)Sunsettommy Wrote: He is one of the AGW believers who writes better than usual.

I agree. I accept he is much smarter than I am but he is trying to push an anti-science agenda and that trips him up each time.

His style of writing reminds me of silas on the Physics Forums.
Environmentalism is based on lies and the lies reflect an agenda that regards humanity as the enemy of the Earth. - Alan Caruba
#35
Is Nature Warning Us of a New Ice Age?

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Ar...ce_age.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#36
Future low solar activity periods may cause extremely cold winters in
North America, Europe and Russia.


http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/looknorthyork...tivity.pdf
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#37
(04-10-2010, 08:41 PM)Sunsettommy Wrote: Is Nature Warning Us of a New Ice Age?

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Ar...ce_age.pdf

Thanks for that. The article referenced in the above article titled "Where the Global Warmning Hoax Was Born" by Marjorie, Mazel-Hecht should be required reading for everyone.


http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/Ar...axBorn.pdf


It makes it perfectly clear why "to establish the scientific basis for human caused global warming" is part of the mission statement of the IPCC. The AGW conclusion was reached about 40 years ago before there were even computer climate models or any serious research! The intellectual elite have done more to screw up the planet an entire atmosphere of CO2 could ever accomplish. One of those elitists and Paul Erlich disciple from the 70s, John Holdren, is now the chief science advisor to to the Clueless One (aka Barack Obama). And through Obama, they now have the bully pulpit and law making capability, to say nothing of the willing participation of the equally clueless national media and magazines such as Discover and Scientific American to continue to promote the hoax. Very scary.
#38
Nice one ajmplanner. Have a look at the link Derek posted over on the Gazebo about the meaning of going green. Then have a look at WUWT post today about ecocide. They want the UN to put "climate deniers" on trial.
Environmentalism is based on lies and the lies reflect an agenda that regards humanity as the enemy of the Earth. - Alan Caruba
#39
ajmplanner,

I have not looked into the link you brought up,but I would not be surprised at her claims that it began in the 1960's.

You might look up Maurice Strong and find out what a bad man he is.

I think jbg made a big post on him a while ago here in this forum?
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
#40
Here is a history lesson about human caused climate change:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32396573/Witch...ng-Maunder

It is about the little ice age and superstition.




Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)