Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Five fatal flaws the greenhouse effect "theory" MUST address.
#21
I think this may be the thread that you are referring to SST.
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=9295

In it Alan Siddons uses my version of his plot, and writes in regard of the plot,
"as Derek Alker illustrates here:"

Thank you SST, I was not aware of that.

AND, in that piece by Alan Siddons is a link to what Richard Lindzen teaches.
http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen/...nhouse.pdf
It takes a bit to download, but on the second page is EXACTLY the same diagram / plot / graphic / graph (call it what you will) that I used in the pdf.
Are you still reading Mostly harmless?
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply
#22
(01-23-2013, 08:13 AM)Derek Wrote: It is over a month since I posted the pdf. There have been 150+ downloads from this forum, it was also posted on the yahoo climate skeptics group, and on the fb group. I have sent copies of it to Jeff Id, WUWT, Jo Nova, Jennifer Marohasy, Donna Laframboise, and Geoff Brown.

Thomas Pearson, Russ Jimeson, John O'sullivan, and Hans Shreuder have all posted / commented positively, otherwise there has not been a single negative reaction or rebuttal from anywhere to date.

It seems "greenhouse" CAN NOT be questioned.
Which is a shame when you think about it, because the truth will out in the end.

Derek if you like I can post the PDF on the other board I sometimes frequent. I bet they'll have many questions. http://www.envirolink.org/forum/

The other board shut down and this is just a few members from that other board. I go by Milton Banana there.

Reply
#23
Please do Goose52. They are welcome to come here and question. If they can produce any rebuttals that would be extremely useful too.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply
#24
It will probably be better if I act as a go between. I was Goose5 on their old board and used the same avatar. I thought it best if I changed my name for their new board. I could copy and paste their responses on this board if that would help. If you have counter questions for them I’ll be happy to post them on that board as well.
Reply
#25
Sounds good to me Goose52. I await the first rebuttal...
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply
#26
I can't seem to get it to post there.
Reply
#27
Goose52, would a copy and paste version be useful rather than a pdf?
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply
#28
Perhaps. I tried two different forums with the same result. Failure.
Reply
#29
Over the last few days I have had posts not appear at the Air Vent and in the Yahoo climate sceptics group, so you are not alone Goose52.

Interestingly in the Yahoo group a newbie appeared calling himself Mike MacCracken posted to dismiss my pdf. It turns out that said newbie is infact a global warming advocate and zealot, a retired director of a (in)famous pro man made climate change alarmism group. I may repeat his arguments here to reply to them. I would not normally quote from a private group, but given MacCracken's dishonesty (he claimed himself to be a "mainline scientist"), then I see no problem with paraphrasing his "rebuttals" here and answering them. I do not see the point in answering him there, because NONE of the other "mainstream sceptics" in that group discussed my pdf at all. Also, if I have problems posting there, as has been the case this week, why should I.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Feynman, the blanket analogy, and Greenhouse effect "theory". Derek 3 10,761 02-06-2015, 06:53 AM
Last Post: Derek
  The imaginary greenhouse effect - a layman's explanation. Derek 0 4,846 10-20-2011, 03:29 PM
Last Post: Derek



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)