Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Top Scientists Vent on NASA’s Sub Prime Greenhouse Gas Hoaxer
#1
A very nice post to read as I think it is one of his best.

John O'Sullivan

May 20,2012

EXCERPT:

Climatologist James Hansen is under sustained attack accused of global warming fraud at a time when the powerful science journal, Nature admits “research is riddled with systematic errors.”

The Nature article (May 9) marks a defining critical moment as a slew of top scientists openly attack climate activist, Professor James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Science (GISS). Since the 1980′s Hansen has been at the forefront of claims that human emissions of carbon dioxide are “catastrophically” warming our planet. For his ceaseless alarmism Hansen has been named and shamed by, among others, the U.S. Government’s premier extreme weather expert, Martin Hoerling (of sister U.S. Government agency, NOAA) who calls Hansen’s science “patently false” and “policy more than it is science.”

Another EXCERPT:

That Whatchamacallit Greenhouse Gas Effect

But an even more worrying aspect of Hansen’s science is his astonishing claim that Earth receives an additional 33 degrees Celsius of heat due to the so-called greenhouse gas effect. Hansen and fellow GHE believers say this additional 33 degrees is due to our atmosphere creating a “blanket effect” so that Earth is “warmer than it would otherwise be.”

LINK
It is our attitude toward free thought and free expression that will determine our fate. There must be no limit on the range of temperate discussion, no limits on thought. No subject must be taboo. No censor must preside at our assemblies.

–William O. Douglas, U.S. Supreme Court Justice, 1952
Reply
#2
WOW, shared on facebook.

Yes, SST, it is John's best yet.
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply
#3
Hello All,
James Hansen has said some amazing things over the years! He has even admitted one of the basic assumptions of GH "theory" and therefore AGW is known to be, and that he knows it to be incorrect, in 1989. Yet, to this day we are still supposed to "understand" that CO2 increases and then temperature increases, that is what we are told. That is also what the computer climate models Hansen has been such an advocate of, model.
It is amazing that no one seems to have picked up on the following...

Environmentalism: Freedoms Foe for the 90s
NOVEMBER 01, 1990 by ROBERT JAMES BIDINOTTO

The following is an abridged version of Mr. Bidinotto’s speech at a Foundation for Economic Education conference on April 28,1990, held at the Alderbrook Resort Inn on the Hood Canal in Washington State.
Excerpts -
“Global Warming” = Political Science

"In the sweltering summer of 1988, Dr. James Hansen, director of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, told Congress: “The earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements . . . . The four warmest years . . . have all been in the 1980s . . . . In my opinion . . . the greenhouse effect has been detected, and it is changing our climate now.”
"

AND,
"The best evidence for the global warming theory, Hansen told me, came from air bubbles trapped deep in Antarctic ice. These revealed lower concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide during ice ages, but much higher concentrations during warm interglacial periods. The greenhouse theory, of course, is that carbon dioxide changes are supposed to cause temperature changes. But when questioned, Hansen admitted that, according to the ice samples, the temperature changes came first. In short, the actual sequence of climatic events was exactly backwards from the greenhouse theory."
The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
(and hence clamorous to be led to safety)
by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.

H. L. Mencken.  

The hobgoblins have to be imaginary so that
"they" can offer their solutions, not THE solutions.
Reply




Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)